tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7800828841873738105.post6185627351483240311..comments2023-07-02T06:58:33.737-05:00Comments on WebberEnergyBlog: A Road Not TakenMichael E. Webber, Ph.D.http://www.blogger.com/profile/12416546342365493633noreply@blogger.comBlogger4125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7800828841873738105.post-54221712915007571152009-02-02T14:28:00.000-06:002009-02-02T14:28:00.000-06:00I happened to catch the end of a discussion on Aus...I happened to catch the end of a discussion on Austin's <A HREF="http://www.kvet.com/pages/buckyandbob.html" REL="nofollow">KVET 98.1 FM </A> about the 10 mill a year for 25 year 30MW solar power facility Dr. Webber talked about last week. Bob Cole, the station's morning host, is also the owner of Austin's Hill's Cafe. He was arguing against the plant with his small business example. <BR/><BR/>Hill's current electric bill for 1 month is around $10,000. The price increase per month for the solar power would be in the range of $600 to $800. Bob makes a dollar profit for each chicken fried steak his restaurant sells. That means, that he would have to sell 600 to 800 more chicken fried steaks in 1 month, in a time when people are not buying, to pay the electric bill. If sales are low, then costs will have to be cut somewhere, most likely in employees. So, Bob claimed that the plant is just not affordable. Because today's technology is not advanced enough for solar, the decision against the power plant is in Bob's words "Not rocket science". Being a huge supporter of the Austin Energy's plan for the nation's largest solar array in the world, I took some offense to these words, but I had never considered the cost to a local business that is not necessarily a large manufacturer. <BR/><BR/>Bob did mention that an Austin resident would only see an increase of about $0.60 with the new plant, and that each year (as technology increases) the price for solar will decrease. I am hopeful that by 2010, when the plant would open, our technology will be enough to substantially lower the cost of solar power. <BR/><BR/><A HREF="http://www.statesman.com/news/content/news/stories/local/01/29/0129solar.html" REL="nofollow">Austin proposes nation's largest solar array</A>amyscholzehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13737441828550095028noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7800828841873738105.post-45147190500974555912009-02-01T19:28:00.000-06:002009-02-01T19:28:00.000-06:00Great post! The Carter/Reagan story certainly hig...Great post! The Carter/Reagan story certainly highlights the political tension that surrounds the energy dilemma here in the U.S. I would definitely agree that solar technology is poised to become a much larger player in the nation's energy portfolio. I wonder, though, how current price fluctuations in oil/gas have affected solar investments. The blog mentioned this volatility as a positive for the solar market, but I am a bit skeptical. So long as oil prices are low, it seems that corporations would have little incentive to invest in expensive, new technologies.<BR/><BR/>Sidenote: Can you repost the "Another Dawn for Solar Power" link? I couldn't get it to work.Brodie Blackhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01375859133489156334noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7800828841873738105.post-73966048328472669942009-02-01T18:01:00.000-06:002009-02-01T18:01:00.000-06:00According to MIT's Technology Review, MTPV Corpora...According to MIT's Technology Review, MTPV Corporation, based in Boston, is working on more efficient solar power through the use of thermal photovoltaics (TPVs). Using solar cells, TPVs generate electricity by converting light radiating from a hot surface. MTPV is working on increasing photon flow from the hot surface to the solar panel. By reducing the gap between the solar cell and the heated material to less than a micron, the inventors have increased electron flow by 10 times that of conventional thermal photovoltaic systems. This will reduce size, price, and required temperature. Although many challenges lie ahead, this offers a peak into what kind of technological breakthroughs may lie ahead. <BR/><BR/>http://www.technologyreview.com/energy/21981/page1/Bryanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01719257023331625052noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7800828841873738105.post-53605274746659939392009-02-01T14:37:00.000-06:002009-02-01T14:37:00.000-06:00Pres. Carter's words marked a point in our history...Pres. Carter's words marked a point in our history where we had a true chance to make a difference with the way we consume energy and impact the environment. The removal of the solar panels from the top of the White House by Pres. Reagan underscores how important and varying the political currents are. With a new administration, climate change on everyone's minds, and energy prices affecting the economy, it looks like we're moving back in the direction Jimmy Carter laid out in front of us. The opportunities are really there for us to take advantage of. Hopefully this will be the start of one of the "greatest adventures taken by the American people."Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com